Disruption-Sensitive Integration Processes: Extracting Knowledge from Live System Faults to Eliminate Security Update Deviations

Authors

  • Dr. Nimal Perera Faculty of Computing, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka

Keywords:

Disruption-sensitive systems, security update deviations, fault analysis, wavelet denoising

Abstract

The rapid evolution of distributed computing systems and automated integration pipelines has significantly increased the complexity of maintaining consistent security update mechanisms. Security update deviations—defined as inconsistencies in patch deployment, authentication updates, and system synchronization—pose critical risks to system integrity and operational continuity. This study introduces a disruption-sensitive integration framework that systematically extracts knowledge from live system faults to mitigate such deviations.

The research builds upon interdisciplinary theoretical foundations, including wavelet-based signal analysis, neural network learning mechanisms, and advanced intrusion detection systems. By conceptualizing system faults as high-frequency anomalies analogous to noise in signal processing, the study applies wavelet-based denoising principles to isolate meaningful disruption patterns (Sweldens, 1996; Dang et al., 2009). Additionally, neural network-based adaptive learning models are integrated to classify and predict fault occurrences, enhancing the system’s responsiveness to emerging threats (Zhang et al., 1995).

A conceptual-analytical methodology is employed to design a multi-layered integration architecture incorporating real-time monitoring, anomaly detection, predictive analytics, and automated remediation. The framework leverages cyber threat intelligence and machine learning-based intrusion detection techniques to identify deviations in security updates and enforce corrective actions (Iyengar et al., 2025; Almotairi et al., 2024). Furthermore, insights from incident-aware pipeline research are incorporated to emphasize the importance of learning from operational disruptions (Thanvi et al., 2026).

The findings indicate that disruption-sensitive systems significantly improve synchronization in security update processes by transforming faults into actionable insights. The integration of predictive models reduces deviation frequency, while adaptive workflows enhance system resilience. However, challenges related to computational complexity and data dependency are identified as critical limitations.

This research contributes to the advancement of intelligent integration systems by bridging fault analysis and security update management. It provides a scalable framework for leveraging live system disruptions as a continuous learning mechanism, offering significant implications for secure software engineering and distributed system management.

References

1. Abdalla, A.S., Tang, B. and Marojevic, V., 2025. AI at the Physical Layer for Wireless Network Security and Privacy. Artificial Intelligence for Future Networks, pp. 341–380.

2. Almotairi, A., Atawneh, S., Khashan, O.A. and Khafajah, N.M., 2024. Enhancing intrusion detection in IoT networks using machine learningbased feature selection and ensemble models. Systems Science & Control Engineering, 12 ( 1 ), p. 2321381.

3. Chen, D., 2025. Network Intrusion Detection Technology Integrating Density Peak Clustering Algorithm and Improved Bi-Directional LSTM. Security and Privacy, 8 ( 2 ), p. e70018.

4. Dang Shuwen, Tian weifeng, Jin Zhihua. Denoising method in FOG based on second generation DB4 wavelet and SURE-threshold. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, vol. 14, pp. 494–498, 2009.

5. Dang Shuwen, Tian weifeng, Qian Feng. De-noising Fractional Noise in Fiber Optic Gyroscopes Based on Lifting Wavelet Chinese Journal of Lasers. vol. 36, pp. 625–629, 2009.

6. Iyengar, S.S., Nabavirazavi, S., Hariprasad, Y., HB, P. and Mohan, C.K., 2025. Cyber Threat Intelligence and Security for Federated Learning in Digital Forensics. In Artificial Intelligence in Practice: Theory and Application for Cyber Security and Forensics (pp. 177–199 ). Cham : Springer Nature Switzerland.

7. Jiao, L.C., Pan, J., Fang, Y. W. : Multiwavelet Neural Network and Its Approximation Properties. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, vol. 12, pp. 1060–1066, 2001.

8. Pati, Y. C., Krishnaprasad, P. S. : Analysis and Synthesis of Feedforward Neural Network Using Discrete Affine Wavelet Transformations. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, vol. 4, pp. 73–85, 1993.

9. Sweldens W. The lifting scheme: A custom-design construction of biorthogonal wavelets. Appl Comput Harmon Anal, vol. 3, pp. 186–200, 1996.

10. Sweldens W. The lifting scheme: A construction of second generation wavelets. SIAM J Math Anal, vol. 29, pp. 511–546, 1997.

11. Szu, H. H., Telfer, B., Kadambe, B. : Neural Network Adaptive Wavelets for Signal Representation and Classification. Optical Engineering, vol. 31, pp. 1907–1906, 1992.

12. Thockchom, N., Singh, M.M. and Nandi, U., 2023. A novel ensemble learning-based model for network intrusion detection. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 9 ( 5 ), pp. 5693–5714.

13. Vali V, Shorthill R W. Fiber Ring Interferometer. Applied Optics, vol. 1, pp. 1099–1100, 1976.

14. Vishnu, C., Abhinav, V., Roy, D., Mohan, C.K. and Babu, C.S., 2023. Improving multi-agent trajectory prediction using traffic states on interactive driving scenarios. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 8 ( 5 ), pp. 2708–2715.

15. You xinwang. The Error Analysis of IFOG Signal based on Wavelet De-noising. Harbin Engineering University. December, 2013.

16. Y. S. Thanvi, L. V. Peri and Y. K. Gangaiah, "Incident-Aware CI/CD Pipelines: Learning from Production Failures to Prevent Certificate Rotation Drift," 2026 14th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS), Boston, MA, USA, 2026, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/ISDFS69419.2026.11459041.

17. Zhang, J., Walter, G. G., Miao, Y. B. : Wavelet Neural Network for Function Learning. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, vol. 43, pp. 1485–1497, 1995.

18. Zhang, Q.H., Benveniste, A. : Wavelet Network. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, vol. 3, pp. 889–898, 1992.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-15

How to Cite

Dr. Nimal Perera. (2026). Disruption-Sensitive Integration Processes: Extracting Knowledge from Live System Faults to Eliminate Security Update Deviations. International Journal of Advance Scientific Research, 6(04), 31-41. https://sciencebring.com/index.php/ijasr/article/view/1189

Similar Articles

11-20 of 393

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.