Improving the Machining Efficiency of Mold Guide Grooves Using A Separable-Insert Method: An Experimental Comparison of Machining Time, Tool Wear, And Surface Roughness

Authors

  • D.A. Akbarov Fergana State Technical University, Fergana, Uzbekistan
  • Y. Y. Khusanov Fergana State Technical University, Fergana, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijasr-06-05-14

Keywords:

Mold die, guide groove, separable insert

Abstract

Machining the complex working surfaces of metal mold dies — in particular the narrow guide grooves along which thread-forming components move — is one of the most time-consuming and tool-intensive operations in mold making. When such grooves are cut directly into the monolithic die body on a vertical milling machine, the long, small-diameter end mills required have low rigidity, are prone to vibration, wear rapidly and leave a poor surface finish, while repeated re-clamping and special fixtures extend the cycle time. This paper proposes and experimentally evaluates a separable-insert method, in which the difficult-to-machine groove zone is removed from the die body, manufactured as a separate small insert under favourable cutting conditions using rigid standard tools, and then installed into a milled seat by a transition fit secured with a bolt. Comparative experiments were carried out on 40X alloy steel (28–32 HRC) using a DMC 1035 V CNC milling centre, with five specimens machined by each method. Machining time, flank wear (VB) and surface roughness (Ra) were measured and compared. The separable-insert method reduced the mean machining time from 281.2 to 184.2 min (−34.5%), reduced flank wear by 32.4% with a corresponding increase in tool life, and improved surface roughness from Ra 1.42 to 0.77 µm (−45.8%), while the coefficient of variation of Ra fell from 9.7% to 6.4%. A two-sample Student t-test (P = 0.95) confirmed that the differences in machining time and surface roughness are statistically significant. The results show that the proposed method substantially improves the machining efficiency and surface quality of mold guide grooves and is suitable for industrial implementation.

References

1. Kosilova A.G., Meshcheryakov R.K. (eds.). Handbook of the Mechanical-Engineering Technologist. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1985. 496 p.

2. Afanaskova Yu.A. Improving the efficiency of the machining technology of shaped surfaces of mold parts. Cand. Tech. Sci. dissertation, 05.02.08. Belgorod, 2010. 154 p.

3. Groover M.P. Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and Systems. Wiley, 2020. 720 p.

4. Kalpakjian S., Schmid S. Manufacturing Engineering and Technology. Pearson, 2018. 1180 p.

5. Klocke F. Manufacturing Processes 1: Cutting. Springer, 2011. 517 p.

6. Hashimoto F. Advances in Ultra-Precision Manufacturing. Springer, 2019. 312 p.

7. Öktem H., Erzurumlu T., Kurt M. A study of the Taguchi optimization method for surface roughness in finish milling of mold surfaces. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2006, vol. 28, pp. 694–700.

8. Öktem H., Erzurumlu T., Kurtaran H. Application of response surface methodology in the optimization of cutting conditions for surface roughness. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2005, vol. 170, pp. 11–16.

9. Wu X., Yin X. Surface roughness prediction in milling of mold steel. J. Manuf. Process., 2020, vol. 52, pp. 46–53.

10. Wu S., Liao H., Li S., Li Z. High-speed milling of hardened mold steel P20 with MQL. J. Manuf. Process., 2021, vol. 64, pp. 1178–1187.

11. de Souza A.F., Machado A., Beckert S.F., Diniz A.E. Evaluating the surface roughness of machined mold surfaces considering the cutting-path strategy. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2014, vol. 214(12), pp. 2862–2869.

12. Krajnik P., Kopač J. Modern machining of die and mold tools. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2004, vol. 157–158, pp. 543–552.

13. Ikhries I.I., Al-Shawabkeh A.F. Optimization of CNC parameters for machining of polymer mold cavities. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019, vol. 102, pp. 3457–3468.

14. Pimenov D.Y., Mia M., Gupta M.K. Energy consumption optimization in CNC machining. J. Clean. Prod., 2020, vol. 275, 124044.

15. Sahu N.K., Chattopadhyay A.K. Taguchi-based optimization of surface finish and tool wear in high-speed milling. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2021, vol. 115, pp. 1267–1280.

16. Montgomery D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 8th ed. Wiley, 2017. 752 p.

17. Altintas Y. Manufacturing Automation: Metal Cutting Mechanics, Machine Tool Vibrations, and CNC Design. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2012. 366 p.

18. Mold-Making Handbook. 3rd ed. Hanser Publishers, 2014. 580 p.

19. Akbarov D.A., Khusanov Y.Y. Technologies for ensuring high accuracy and surface quality on CNC machines. Proc. 2nd Int. Sci. Conf. of FerSTU, Fergana, 2025, pp. 167–169.

20. Khusanov Y.Y., Akbarov D.A. Improving production efficiency by optimizing cutting parameters in CNC milling. Proc. Int. Sci.-Tech. Conf., TSTU Almalyk branch, 2025, pp. 155–156.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

D.A. Akbarov, & Y. Y. Khusanov. (2026). Improving the Machining Efficiency of Mold Guide Grooves Using A Separable-Insert Method: An Experimental Comparison of Machining Time, Tool Wear, And Surface Roughness. International Journal of Advance Scientific Research, 6(05), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijasr-06-05-14

Similar Articles

1-10 of 31

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.