Digitalising Trust: Regulatory Design, Risk, and Inclusion at the Intersection of AI, Big Tech, and Banking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/Keywords:
Digitalisation, Artificial Intelligence, Big Tech, Financial Regulation, Credit, Consumer Protection, Supervisory TechnologyAbstract
This article examines the multifaceted transformation of the finance sector driven by digitalisation, artificial intelligence (AI), and the increasing participation of big tech firms in banking services. It synthesises theoretical frameworks of financial regulation with empirical and policy-oriented literature to propose an integrative understanding of regulatory challenges and policy design choices. Drawing on interdisciplinary sources, the paper advances three core arguments. First, the digitalisation of finance fundamentally alters information asymmetries, market structure, and the set of systemic risks that regulators must confront, necessitating an adaptive regulatory stance that blends traditional prudential tools with more dynamic, data- and algorithm-aware supervision (Arner, Barberis & Buckley, 2015; BCBS, 2024). Second, the entry and expansion of big tech and fintech into credit markets reconfigures competitive dynamics and consumer relationships, offering both inclusionary opportunities and concentrated-risk pathways that demand tailored oversight—particularly regarding data governance, model transparency, and adverse action in automated credit decisioning (Cornelli et al., 2023; Barakova, Ehrentraud & Leposke, 2024; CFPB, 2022). Third, governance of AI in finance sits at the confluence of cross-border regulatory fragmentation and rapidly evolving technological capacities; effective policy requires harmonised principles, robust supervisory capacity building, and mechanisms for algorithmic accountability that preserve innovation while protecting financial stability and consumer rights (BCBS, 2022; Calabia, 2024; CSET, 2024). The paper offers a detailed discussion of regulatory instruments—ranging from transparency mandates and model validation standards to supervisory sandboxes and macroprudential augmentation—and elaborates on trade-offs, implementation constraints, and research priorities. It concludes with policy recommendations emphasising multi-level regulatory coordination, investment in regulatory technology (RegTech), and a principled yet flexible framework for AI governance that aligns prudential aims with inclusion and market contestability.Digitalisation; Artificial Intelligence; Big Tech; Financial Regulation; Credit; Consumer Protection; Supervisory Technology
Downloads
References
1. Barakova, I., Ehrentraud, J., & Leposke, L. (2024). A two-sided affair: banks and tech firms in banking. FSI Insights on policy implementation, no 60, October.
2. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). (2022). Newsletter on artificial intelligence and machine learning, March.
3. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). (2024). Digitalisation of finance. BCBS Working Papers, May.
4. Calabia, C. (2024). AI: transforming the future or triggering fear? Generative artificial intelligence and its impact on financial consumers and regulators, March.
5. Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET). (2024). Translation of the artificial intelligence law of the People’s Republic of China, May.
6. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). (2022). Adverse action notification requirements in connection with credit decisions based on complex algorithms. Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2022-03, May.
7. Cornelli, G., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., Rau, R., Wardrop, R., & Ziegler, T. (2023). Fintech and big tech credit: drivers of the growth of digital lending. Journal of Banking & Finance, 148:106742, March.
8. Cornerstone Advisors. (2020). Credit modelling and the need for speed: the case for advanced technologies. Research Report.
9. European Banking Authority (EBA). (2020). Report on big data and advanced analytics, January.
10. Armour, J., Awrey, D., Davies, P. L., Enriques, L., Gordon, J. N., Mayer, C. P., & Payne, J. (2016). Principles of Financial Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2015). The Evolution of Fintech: A New Post-Crisis Paradigm. University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper 47:1271.
12. Singh, V. (2025). Adaptive Financial Regulation Through Multi-Policy Analysis using Machine Learning Techniques. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), Volume 14.
13. Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckey, R. (2017). FinTech, Regtech, and the reconceptualization of financial regulation. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 37:371–413.
14. Arner, D. W., Buckley, R. P., & Zetzsche, D. A. (2018). Fintech for Financial Inclusion: A Framework for Digital Financial Transformation. UNSW Law Research Paper. Available online.
15. Azinge-Egbiri, N. (2021). Preconditions for Effective Regulations of Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (AML/CFT) and Compliance Drivers in African Countries and Emerging Economies (AC/EES). In Regulating and Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing. London: Routledge, pp. 62–127.
16. Bains, P., & Wu, C. (2023). Institutional Arrangements for Fintech Regulation: Supervisory Monitoring. FinTech Notes. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
17. Baldwin, R., & Weder di Mauro, B. (2019). Economics in the Time of COVID-19. CEPR.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Alejandro García

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.