Integrative Approaches To Risk Forecasting And Management In Complex Systems Using Advanced Time-Series And AI-Driven Models

Authors

  • Johnathan M. Whitaker Global Institute of Technology, London, United Kingdom

Keywords:

Time-series forecasting, risk management, AI-driven models

Abstract

The contemporary landscape of risk forecasting and management is increasingly shaped by the convergence of complex data streams, digital technologies, and artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies. This study synthesizes theoretical frameworks and applied methodologies for predicting and mitigating risks across financial, industrial, and environmental systems. Time-series modeling, particularly advanced neural network architectures such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Nonlinear Auto-Regressive with Exogenous Input (NARX), forms the core analytical tool for forecasting dynamic events in volatile environments (Lim & Zohren, 2021; Amelot et al., 2021). Complementary techniques, including fuzzy association rules, hybrid kernel principal component analysis-support vector regression (KPCA–SVR), and attention-based architectures, are explored for their efficacy in capturing non-linear relationships and temporal dependencies in large-scale datasets (Shang et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021).

The study emphasizes the role of digital transformation, Industry 4.0 integration, and real-time data pipelines, such as Kafka event sourcing, in enabling responsive and adaptive risk analytics (Kesarpu & Dasari, 2025; Ivanov et al., 2019). Multidimensional applications are considered, ranging from financial risk evaluation, foreign exchange forecasting, and industrial operational monitoring to natural hazard estimation, including landslides and flood volume projections (Mesioye & Bakare, 2020; Kwak et al., 2013; Dai et al., 2002). Critical challenges such as uncertainty quantification, data quality assessment, and the ethical implementation of AI-driven decision systems are also discussed (Walker et al., 2003; Aven, 2016).

This research integrates theoretical and applied perspectives to propose a unified framework for risk prediction, emphasizing methodological rigor, model interpretability, and actionable insights. The findings highlight that leveraging deep learning, hybrid modeling, and event-driven analytics not only improves forecasting accuracy but also enhances proactive decision-making in dynamic and uncertain environments. The study concludes with a forward-looking agenda that identifies emerging trends in AI-assisted risk management, including the potential for scalable, near real-time monitoring systems across diverse sectors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Lim B, Zohren S. Time-series forecasting with deep learning: a survey. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 2021 Apr 5;379(2194):20200209.

2. Shang H, Lu D, Zhou Q. Early warning of enterprise finance risk of big data mining in internet of things based on fuzzy association rules. Neural Computing and Applications. 2021 May;33(9):3901-9.

3. Amelot LM, Subadar Agathee U, Sunecher Y. Time series modelling, NARX neural network and hybrid KPCA–SVR approach to forecast the foreign exchange market in Mauritius. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies. 2021 Feb 12;12(1):18-54.

4. Li J, Yang B, Li H, Wang Y, Qi C, Liu Y. DTDR–ALSTM: Extracting dynamic time-delays to reconstruct multivariate data for improving attention-based LSTM industrial time series prediction models. Knowledge-Based Systems. 2021 Jan 9;211:106508.

5. Alvarez FM, Troncoso A, Riquelme JC, Ruiz JS. Energy time series forecasting based on pattern sequence similarity. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 2010 Nov 9;23(8):1230-43.

6. Mesioye O, Bakare IA. Evaluating financial reporting quality: Metrics, challenges, and impact on decision-making. Int J Res Public Rev. 2020;5(10):1144-1156. doi: https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.1024.2735

7. Kwak Y, Park J, Fukami K. Near real-time flood volume estimation from MODIS time-series imagery in the Indus River Basin. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing. 2013 Oct 17;7(2):578-86.

8. Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY. Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Engineering geology. 2002 Apr 1;64(1):65-87.

9. Koohathongsumrit N, Meethom W. An integrated approach of fuzzy risk assessment model and data envelopment analysis for route selection in multimodal transportation networks. Expert Systems with Applications. 2021 Jun 1;171:114342.

10. Chukwunweike JN, Adewale AA, Osamuyi O. Advanced modelling and recurrent analysis in network security: Scrutiny of data and fault resolution. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2024;23(2):2582. doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.2.2582

11. Aliyu Enemosah. Enhancing DevOps efficiency through AI-driven predictive models for continuous integration and deployment pipelines. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. 2025 Jan;6(1):871-887.

12. Kesarpu S, Dasari HP. Kafka Event Sourcing for Real-Time Risk Analysis. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering. 2025;11(3).

13. Dugbartey AN, Kehinde O. Review Article. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2025;25(1):1237-1257. doi:10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.1.0193

14. Walker WE, Harremoës P, Rotmans J, Van Der Sluijs JP, Van Asselt MB, Janssen P, Krayer von Krauss MP. Defining uncertainty: a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated assessment. 2003 Mar 1;4(1):5-17.

15. Ivanov D, Dolgui A, Sokolov B. The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research. 2019 Feb 1;57(3):829-46.

16. Chukwunweike JN, Yussuf M, Okusi O, Bakare TO, Abisola AJ. The role of deep learning in ensuring privacy integrity and security: Applications in AI-driven cybersecurity solutions. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2024;23:1778–90. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.2.2550

17. Aven T. Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research. 2016 Aug 16;253(1):1-3.

18. Kadir ZA, Mohammad R, Othman N, Amrin A, Muhtazaruddin MN, Abu-Bakar SH, Muhammad-Sukki F. Risk management framework for handling and storage of cargo at major ports in Malaysia towards port sustainability. Sustainability. 2020 Jan 9;12(2):516.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Integrative Approaches To Risk Forecasting And Management In Complex Systems Using Advanced Time-Series And AI-Driven Models. (2025). International Journal of Advance Scientific Research, 5(09), 77-83. https://sciencebring.com/index.php/ijasr/article/view/1004

Similar Articles

31-40 of 287

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.