AI-Enabled Predictive Maintenance and Intelligent DevOps for Cyber-Physical Energy and Manufacturing Systems: An Integrated Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry
Keywords:
AI-driven DevOps, predictive maintenance, Industry 4.0, Internet of ThingsAbstract
The accelerating convergence of artificial intelligence, cyber-physical systems, and intelligent automation has fundamentally reshaped how complex industrial assets are designed, deployed, operated, and maintained. Across sectors as diverse as advanced manufacturing, photovoltaic energy production, smart grids, and mining operations, organizations increasingly rely on algorithmic systems to anticipate failures, optimize performance, and coordinate distributed infrastructures. Yet despite a growing body of research on predictive maintenance, Internet of Things architectures, and machine learning–based diagnostics, a persistent conceptual and operational gap remains between the analytics layer and the software and deployment layer that operationalizes these insights at scale. This gap has become especially salient in the era of AI-driven DevOps, where machine learning models are no longer static tools but continuously evolving agents embedded in deployment pipelines, monitoring systems, and decision workflows.
This article develops a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework that integrates predictive maintenance, IoT-based monitoring, and AI-enabled DevOps into a single coherent paradigm for modern cyber-physical systems. Grounded in an extensive synthesis of literature on Industry 4.0, Maintenance 4.0, and intelligent energy management, the study positions AI-driven DevOps as the connective tissue that links sensor-level data acquisition to enterprise-level decision-making and automated intervention. Drawing on the conceptual foundations of intelligent automation articulated in contemporary DevOps research, including the systematic review of machine learning–based deployment and maintenance strategies by Varanasi (2025), the paper argues that predictive maintenance cannot be fully realized without embedding its models within adaptive, continuously learning operational pipelines.
The methodology employs a qualitative-analytical research design that synthesizes architectural models, algorithmic approaches, and application case studies from manufacturing and renewable energy systems. Through comparative analysis, the study evaluates how different predictive maintenance strategies, such as neural network–based fault diagnosis, physics-informed learning, and edge-based analytics, perform when coupled with AI-driven DevOps pipelines. Rather than relying on numerical simulation, the research advances a detailed interpretive analysis of how data flows, decision logic, and automation routines interact across system layers.
The results demonstrate that systems integrating predictive maintenance with AI-enabled DevOps exhibit superior resilience, scalability, and cyber-physical coherence compared to siloed approaches. In manufacturing environments, intelligent deployment pipelines enable rapid retraining and redeployment of diagnostic models in response to changing operational regimes, while in photovoltaic and smart grid systems, edge-based learning combined with centralized orchestration supports real-time anomaly detection and coordinated response. These outcomes reinforce the central thesis that predictive maintenance is no longer merely a data science problem but a socio-technical system that must be managed through continuous integration, continuous deployment, and continuous learning.
The discussion situates these findings within broader debates about algorithmic governance, cybersecurity, and sustainability. It critically examines the risks of over-automation, the challenges of data heterogeneity, and the ethical implications of delegating maintenance decisions to intelligent systems. By weaving together insights from predictive maintenance, IoT architectures, and AI-driven DevOps, the article offers a unified vision for the next generation of industrial intelligence. In doing so, it provides both theoretical clarity and practical guidance for researchers, engineers, and policy makers seeking to build resilient, adaptive, and trustworthy cyber-physical infrastructures.
References
1. Kaliyannan, G. V., Sri Anbupalani, M., Kandasamy, S., Sivaraj, S., and Gunasekaran, R. (2023). Role of IoT in Industry Predictive Maintenance. Integration of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering with IoT, 191–213.
2. El Bazi, N., Mabrouki, M., Laayati, O., Ouhabi, N., El Hadraoui, H., Hammouch, F. E., and Chebak, A. (2023). Generic Multi-Layered Digital-Twin-Framework-Enabled Asset Lifecycle Management for the Sustainable Mining Industry. Sustainability, 15, 3470.
3. Varanasi, S. R. (2025, August). AI-Driven DevOps in Modern Software Engineering—A Review of Machine Learning Based Intelligent Automation for Deployment and Maintenance. In 2025 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Information Technology, Electronics and Intelligent Communication Systems (ICITEICS), 1–7. IEEE.
4. Huang, Z., Duan, S., Long, F., Li, Y., Zhu, J., and Ling, Q. (2021). Fault Diagnosis for Solar Panels using Convolutional Neural Network. In Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 153–158.
5. Laayati, O., El Hadraoui, H., Bouzi, M., and Chebak, A. (2022). Smart Energy Management System: Oil Immersed Power Transformer Failure Prediction and Classification Techniques Based on DGA Data. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology, 1–6.
6. Ten, C. W., Yamashita, K., Yang, Z., Vasilakos, A. V., and Ginter, A. (2017). Impact assessment of hypothesized cyberattacks on interconnected bulk power systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9, 4405–4425.
7. Li, Z., Wang, Y., and Wang, K. S. (2017). Intelligent predictive maintenance for fault diagnosis and prognosis in machine centers: Industry 4.0 scenario. Advances in Manufacturing, 5, 377–387.
8. Mihigo, I. N., Zennaro, M., Uwitonze, A., Rwigema, J., and Rovai, M. (2022). On-Device IoT-Based Predictive Maintenance Analytics Model: Comparing TinyLSTM and TinyModel from Edge Impulse. Sensors, 22, 5174.
9. Cachada, A., Barbosa, J., Leitno, P., Geralds, C. A., Deusdado, L., Costa, J., and Romero, L. (2018). Maintenance 4.0: Intelligent and predictive maintenance system architecture. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 139–146.
10. Hojabri, M., Kellerhals, S., Upadhyay, G., and Bowler, B. (2022). IoT-based PV array fault detection and classification using embedded supervised learning methods. Energies, 15, 2097.
11. Sajun, A. R., Shapsough, S., Zualkernan, I., and Dhaouadi, R. (2022). Edge-based individualized anomaly detection in large-scale distributed solar farms. ICT Express, 8, 174–178.
12. Huber, L. G., Palme, T., and Chao, M. A. (2023). Physics-informed machine learning for predictive maintenance: Applied use cases. In Proceedings of the IEEE Swiss Conference on Data Science, 66–72.
13. El Maghraoui, A., Ledmaoui, Y., Laayati, O., El Hadraoui, H., and Chebak, A. (2022). Smart Energy Management: A Comparative Study of Energy Consumption Forecasting Algorithms for an Experimental Open-Pit Mine. Energies, 15, 4569.
14. Janarthanan, R., Maheshwari, R., Shukla, P., Shukla, P., Mirjalili, S., and Kumar, M. (2021). Intelligent Detection of the PV Faults Based on Artificial Neural Network and Type 2 Fuzzy Systems. Energies, 14, 6584.
15. Patil, S. M., Vijayalashmi, M., and Tapaskar, R. (2017). IoT Based Solar Energy Monitoring System. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing, 1574–1579.
16. Maghraoui, A. E., Hammouch, F. E., Ledmaoui, Y., and Chebak, A. (2022). Smart Energy Management System: A Comparative Study of Energy Consumption Prediction Algorithms for a Hotel Building. In Proceedings of the Global Power, Energy and Communication Conference, 529–534.
17. Walker, A., Desai, J., Saleem, D., and Gunda, T. (2021). Cybersecurity in Photovoltaic Plant Operations. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report.
18. Selvaraj, T., Rengaraj, R., Venkatakrishnan, G., Soundararajan, S., Natarajan, K., Balachandran, P., David, P., and Shitharth, S. (2022). Environmental Fault Diagnosis of Solar Panels Using Solar Thermal Images in Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks. Wiley.
19. Appiah, A. Y., Zhang, X., Ayawli, B. B. K., and Kyeremeh, F. (2019). Review and Performance Evaluation of Photovoltaic Array Fault Detection and Diagnosis Techniques. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2019, e6953530.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Christopher V. Belmore
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
