AI-Assisted Defect Detection and Test Prioritization in Software Quality Engineering

Authors

  • Mio Watanabe Department of Computer Science and Machine Intelligence, Advanced Technology Research Center, Nagoya, Japan

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Defect Detection, Test Prioritization, Software Quality Engineering

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted software quality engineering is increasingly concerned with reducing the cost of defect identification while improving the efficiency with which limited testing resources are allocated. This research develops a conceptual framework for AI-assisted defect detection and test prioritization by synthesizing the methodological and technological patterns evident in the provided literature. Although the supplied studies are predominantly situated in augmented reality (AR), simulation-based learning, engineering visualization, embedded monitoring, and technology-enabled experimentation, they collectively demonstrate principles relevant to intelligent quality assurance: automated observation, simulation, data-driven classification, prioritization of critical conditions, and continuous feedback. The proposed framework integrates data acquisition, defect-feature extraction, AI-assisted classification, risk-aware test prioritization, execution feedback, and iterative model refinement. Particular attention is given to the distinction between defect detection and test prioritization, since accurate identification alone does not guarantee efficient testing. The analysis further positions project-risk prediction as a complementary decision-support mechanism, emphasizing how predictive reasoning can improve prioritization decisions (Philip, 2024). The resulting framework provides a conceptual basis for incorporating AI into modern software quality engineering while recognizing limitations associated with heterogeneous data, domain transfer, model interpretability, validation, and the absence of empirical software-testing datasets within the supplied literature.

References

1. Bogusevschi, D., Muntean, C. H., & Muntean, G. M. (2020). Teaching and learning physics using 3D virtual learning environment: A case study of combined virtual reality and virtual laboratory in secondary school. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching,39,518.http://www.new tonproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/SITE2019_DBogusevschi_ Camera Ready.pdf

2. Cai, S., Liu, C., Wang, T., Liu, E., & Liang, J. (2021). Effects of learning physics using Augmented Reality on students’ self-efficacy and conceptions of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology,52, 235–251.

3. COMSOL Multiphysics 5.6. 2020. Available at:https://www.comsol.com/model/thermoelectric-cooler-30611

4. Cui, Y., Zhao, H., & Zhao, L. (2020). Design of greenhouse shuttercontroller based on STM8.Agricultural Technology and Equipment, 01, 21–23.

5. Garon, M., Boulet, P., Doironz, J., Beaulieu, L., & Lalonde, J.(2016). Real-time high resolution 3D data on the HoloLens.In2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct)(pp. 189–191).

6. Harun, Tuli, N., & Mantri, A. (2020). Experience Fleming’s rule inelectroma gnetism using augmented reality: Analyzing impacton students learning.

7. Procedia Computer Science,172,660–668.

8. Hedenqvist, C., Romero, M., & Vinuesa, R. (2021). Improving the learning of mechanics through augmented reality. Technology Knowledge Learning,

9. Huang, J. M., Ong, S.K., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2017). Visualization and interaction of finite element analysis in augmented reality. Computer-Aided Design,84,1–14.

10. Kim, Y., Kim, H., Lee, S., & Kim, W. (2021). Trustworthy buildingfire detection framework with simulation-based learning. IEEE Access.

11. Liu, W. (2021). Design of wireless low-power temperature and humidity monitoring terminal based on STM8.Electrotechnics,18,42–44.

12. Long,X.,Chen,Y.,&Zhou,J.(2021).Augmentedrealityexperimentonmechanical stress of block on arch with simulation-based asset. In2021 4th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Aided Education, September 24–26, 2021, Dalian, China. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5 pages.

13. Lu, Y., Chen, J., Li, J., & Xu, W. (2022). A study on theele ctromagnetic–thermal coupling effect of cross-slotfre quency selective surface. Materials, 15, 640.

14. Mota, J. M., Rube, I. R., Dodero, J. M., & Sánchez, I. A. (2018).Augmented reality mobile app development for all. Computers and Electrical Engineering,65, 250–260.

15. Osadchyi, V. V., Valko, N. V., & Kuzmich, L. V. (2021). Usingau gmented reality technologies for STEM education organization. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1840,012027.

16. Sahin, D., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). The effect of augmented reality technology on middle school students’ achievements and attitudes towards science education. Computers &Education,144, 103710, 1–11.

17. Philip, P. G. (2025). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for Project Governance: Improving Transparency and Stakeholder Trust in Automated Project Decision. Journal of Project Management Studies, 2(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.58425/jpms.v2i1.570

18. Ramamurthy, K. (2023). AI-Driven Test Automation Frameworks for the Modern Software Quality Engineering. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 4(4), 257-269.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-18

How to Cite

Mio Watanabe. (2026). AI-Assisted Defect Detection and Test Prioritization in Software Quality Engineering . International Journal of Advance Scientific Research, 6(08), 150-160. https://sciencebring.com/index.php/ijasr/article/view/1305

Similar Articles

51-60 of 370

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.