SCIENCEBRING   /   HAMBURG, GERMANY
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research SCIENTIFIC IDEAS. INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES.
ISSN 2750-1396 12 issues per year · Monthly
Crossref DOI: 10.37547/ijasr

Search the Journal

Articles Published:

Real-Time IoT-Based Energy Consumption Management for Improving Energy Efficiency in Cottonseed Oil Production

Vol. 6 No. 03 (2026): Volume 06 Issue 03 Pages 250-267
DOI 10.37547/ijasr-06-03-12 ↗
RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Abstract

Cottonseed oil mills are electricity-intensive, and most of their demand comes from motor-driven hulling, conditioning and screw-pressing units whose specific energy consumption (SEC) depends strongly on raw-material properties that vary from batch to batch. Conventional energy accounting in such plants relies on monthly meter readings and cannot respond to these variations. This study develops and evaluates a real-time energy management approach for a cottonseed oil mill in Kokand, Uzbekistan, that links Internet of Things (IoT) sensing with process-level control. A five-layer IoT–edge–PLC–SCADA–cloud architecture samples electrical and technological variables at 1 s intervals. Energy characteristics of the main aggregates were identified by regression: the SEC of the MP-3000 screw press has a minimum of 19.1 kWh/t at a cake output of 0.68 t/h, and the residual oil in hulls reaches its minimum at seed moistures of 12.1%, 11.3% and 12.5% for grades I–II, III and IV. These relations are embedded in a moisture-aware SEC model that normalises throughput to conditioned mass and accounts for seed oil content, whose variation between 15% and 23% changes the SEC per tonne of oil by 53% at the press and by 36% at plant level. A damped Newton–Raphson optimiser computes the moisture and press-torque set-points in real time from a model re-identified on line, and the PLC enforces them through the seed conditioner and variable-frequency drives. In MATLAB/Simulink simulations parameterised with plant data, the closed loop narrowed moisture variability from ±2.4% to ±0.3%, press-torque fluctuation from ±18% to ±4% and load dispersion from ±15% to ±5%, and reduced the SEC of the pressing line from 53.1 to 49.2 kWh/t (7.3%). At plant level the implementation is credited with saving 142.2 MWh of electricity per year (128 million UZS) for an investment of 405 million UZS, giving a simple payback of 3.2 years and an internal rate of return of 29%. The results show that coupling IoT data with raw-material-aware process models turns energy monitoring into an active control variable in oilseed processing.

Keywords

SOURCES & CITATIONS

References

1. Abdelaziz EA, Saidur R, Mekhilef S. A review on energy saving strategies in industrial sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011;15(1):150–168.
2. Saidur R. A review on electrical motors energy use and energy savings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010;14(3):877–898.
3. Hasanuzzaman M, Rahim NA, Saidur R, Kazi SN. Energy savings and emissions reductions for rewinding and replacement of industrial motor. Energy 2011;36(1):233–240.
4. Waide P, Brunner CU. Energy-Efficiency Policy Opportunities for Electric Motor-Driven Systems. IEA Energy Papers 2011/07. Paris: OECD/IEA; 2011.
5. Ladha-Sabur A, Bakalis S, Fryer PJ, Lopez-Quiroga E. Mapping energy consumption in food manufacturing. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2019;86:270–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.034
6. Compton M, Willis S, Rezaie B, Humes K. Food processing industry energy and water consumption in the Pacific northwest. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 2018;47:371–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.001
7. O’Brien RD, Jones LA, King CC, Wakelyn PJ, Wan PJ. Cottonseed oil. In: Shahidi F, editor. Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 6th ed., Vol. 2. Hoboken: Wiley; 2005.
8. Shrouf F, Miragliotta G. Energy management based on Internet of Things: practices and framework for adoption in production management. Journal of Cleaner Production 2015;100:235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.055
9. Wei M, Hong SH, Alam M. An IoT-based energy-management platform for industrial facilities. Applied Energy 2016;164:607–619.
10. Chen X, Li C, Tang Y, Xiao Q. An Internet of Things based energy efficiency monitoring and management system for machining workshop. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018;199:957–968.
11. Mohamed N, Al-Jaroodi J, Lazarova-Molnar S. Leveraging the capabilities of Industry 4.0 for improving energy efficiency in smart factories. IEEE Access 2019;7:18008–18020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2897045
12. Arana-Landín G, Uriarte-Gallastegi N, Landeta-Manzano B, Laskurain-Iturbe I. The contribution of lean management–Industry 4.0 technologies to improving energy efficiency. Energies 2023;16(5):2124. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052124
13. Haddouche M, Ilinca A. Energy efficiency and Industry 4.0 in wood industry: a review and comparison to other industries. Energies 2022;15(7):2384. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15072384
14. Jagtap S, Rahimifard S, Duong LNK. Real-time data collection to improve energy efficiency: a case study of food manufacturer. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, e14338. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14338
15. Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PQ-4422 of 22 August 2019 “On accelerated measures to improve energy efficiency of economic sectors and the social sphere, introduce energy-saving technologies and develop renewable energy sources”. https://lex.uz/docs/4486125
16. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On energy saving, rational use of energy and improvement of energy efficiency”, signed 7 August 2024, in force from 9 November 2024.
17. Usmonov ShY, Sobirov MN. Improving energy efficiency in food production with real time data management. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Engineering and Technology 2025;12(8):23721–23729.
18. O’zDSt 596:2014. Cottonseed for technical purposes. Specifications. Tashkent: Uzstandard; 2014.
19. Nocedal J, Wright SJ. Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2006.
20. Hong T, Fan S. Probabilistic electric load forecasting: a tutorial review. International Journal of Forecasting 2016;32(3):914–938.
21. ISO 50001:2018. Energy management systems — Requirements with guidance for use. Geneva: ISO; 2018.
22. Efficiency Valuation Organization. International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP): Core Concepts. Washington, DC: EVO; 2022.
23. ISO 50015:2014. Energy management systems — Measurement and verification of energy performance of organizations — General principles and guidance. Geneva: ISO; 2014.
DISCOVER RELATED RESEARCH

Similar Articles

Continue exploring the collection ↗
11-20 of 432