Cognitive Efficiency in Environmental Dashboards: Bridging Visual Perception Theory and Spatiotemporal Sustainability Monitoring

Authors

  • Dr. Arvenik A. Morchenko Centre for Digital Sustainability & Spatiotemporal Analysis, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/

Keywords:

Visual Perception, Sustainability Dashboards, Cognitive Load, Spatiotemporal Analysis

Abstract

The exponential growth of environmental data, driven by IoT sensors and satellite monitoring, presents a critical challenge in sustainability science: the "insight gap" between data availability and cognitive comprehension. While Digital Twins and GIS-enabled systems offer granular details on carbon emissions and air quality, the efficacy of these tools is often compromised by suboptimal visual design that ignores human cognitive limitations. This article synthesizes recent findings in visual perception psychology with advanced environmental monitoring frameworks to propose a model of "Cognitive Efficiency" for sustainability dashboards. By integrating literature on spatiotemporal aggregation, decluttering protocols, and interactive animation, this study examines how design choices influence decision-making in carbon capture and household low-carbon practices. The analysis suggests that while high-fidelity Digital Twins are essential for technical precision, simpler, decluttered visualizations utilizing strategic aggregation are more effective for rapid risk assessment and behavioral modification. We identify a dichotomy between "exploratory" and "explanatory" environmental visualizations and argue that the failure to distinguish between them leads to cognitive overload. The paper concludes by outlining design principles that align information visualization (InfoVis) with geovisualization (GeoVis) to maximize the communicative impact of sustainability data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. The Psychology of Visual Perception in Data Dashboards: Designing for Impact. (2025). International Journal of Data Science and

Machine Learning, 5(02), 79-86.

https://doi.org/10.55640/ijdsml-05-02-07

2. Jern, M.; Franzen, J. Integrating infovis and geovis components. In Proceedings of the 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV’07), Zurich, Switzerland, 4–6 July 2007; pp. 511–520.

3. Park, J.; Yang, B. GIS-enabled digital twin system for sustainable evaluation of carbon emissions: A case study of Jeonju city, south Korea. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9186.

4. Wu, C.; Hu, W.; Zhou, M.; Li, S.; Jia, Y. Data-driven regionalization for analyzing the spatiotemporal characteristics of air quality in China. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 203, 172–182.

5. Adenle, Y.A.; Alshuwaikhat, H.M. Spatial estimation and visualization of CO2 emissions for campus sustainability: The case of King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Saudi Arabia. Sustainability 2017, 9,

2124.

6. Middleton, R.S.; Yaw, S.P.; Hoover, B.A.; Ellett,

K.M. SimCCS: An open-source tool for optimizing CO2 capture, transport, and storage infrastructure. Environ. Model. Softw. 2020, 124, 104560.

7. Ming, F.X.; Habeeb, R.A.A.; Nasaruddin, F.H.B.; Gani, A.B. Real-time carbon dioxide monitoring based on iot & cloud technologies. In Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Software and Computer

Applications, Penang, Malaysia, 19–21 February 2019; pp. 517–521.

8. Liu, X.; Jin, Z. Visualisation approach and economic incentives toward low carbon practices in households: A survey study in Hyogo, Japan. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 220, 298–

312.

9. Abukhodair, F. A., Riecke, B. E., Erhan, H. I., & Shaw, C. D. (2013). Does interactive animation control improve exploratory data analysis of animated trend visualization? In Visualization and Data Analysis 2013 (Vol. 8654, p. 86540I). International Society for Optics and Photonics.

10. Ajani, K., Lee, E., Xiong, C., Knaflic, C. N., Kemper, W., & Franconeri, S. (2021). Declutter and focus: Empirically evaluating design guidelines for effective data communication. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. Advance online publication.

11. Akl, E. A., Oxman, A. D., Herrin, J., Vist, G. E., Terrenato, I., Sperati, F., Costiniuk, C., Blank, D., & Schünemann, H. (2011). Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011(3), Article CD006776.

12. Albers, D., Correll, M., & Gleicher, M. (2014). Task-driven evaluation of aggregation in time series visualization. In CHI ’14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 551–560). Association for Computing Machinery.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Cognitive Efficiency in Environmental Dashboards: Bridging Visual Perception Theory and Spatiotemporal Sustainability Monitoring. (2025). International Journal of Advance Scientific Research, 5(10), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.37547/

Similar Articles

21-30 of 240

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.