Tribological Performance and Wear Mechanisms of Fused Deposition Modeling Polymers: An Integrative Theoretical and Experimental Synthesis
Keywords:
Fused deposition modelling, tribology, polymer composites, wear mechanismsAbstract
Background: Additive manufacturing by fused deposition modelling (FDM) has transformed how thermoplastic parts are designed and produced, enabling rapid prototyping and bespoke functional components. However, the tribological performance—friction, wear, and abrasion resistance—of FDM-produced polymers remains a critical limitation for load-bearing and sliding applications (Cano-Vicent et al., 2021; Roy & Mukhopadhyay, 2020).
Objective: This article synthesizes the state of knowledge from materials science, tribology, rheology, and additive-manufacturing process engineering to produce a coherent, publication-ready examination of tribological behaviors of common FDM polymers (ABS, PLA, composites with fillers and lubricants), identify persistent research gaps, and propose rigorous methodologies for future investigation (Prabhu & Devaraju, 2020; Equbal et al., 2010).
Methods: The work integrates comparative literature analysis, theoretical elaboration on mechanisms (molecular mobility, glass transition, interfacial adhesion, asperity interactions), and a conceptual experimental framework including standardized sliding wear testers, parametric process mapping, and multiscale characterizations from nano- to macro-length scales (Dealy, 1992; Chartoff et al., 1994). Where empirical trends are reported from prior studies, results are described qualitatively and placed in mechanistic context (Srinivasan et al., 2020; Keshavamurthy et al., 2021).
Results: The synthesis reveals consistent patterns: anisotropic build-induced heterogeneity dominates mechanical and tribological response; filler type and dispersion govern load transfer and third-body formation; lubrication (both intrinsic via solid lubricants and extrinsic coatings) alters dominant wear regimes from adhesive to abrasive or fatigue-driven mechanisms; and rheological behavior during deposition determines interlayer bonding and thus surface and subsurface resistance to material removal (Roy & Mukhopadhyay, 2020; Mourya et al., 2023; Keshavamurthy et al., 2021).
Conclusions: Advancing tribological performance for FDM parts requires combined strategies: tailored polymer chemistry and nanofillers for viscoelastic tuning, deposition process control to minimize structural anisotropy, and engineered surface texturing or lubricant incorporation to manage contact mechanics. Robust methodology—multi-length-scale testing, statistical design of experiments, and mechanistic interpretation grounded in polymer physics—will be necessary to close critical research gaps identified herein (Aditya & Srinivas, 2023; Raichur et al., 2024).
Downloads
References
1. Aditya T., Srinivas S. Mind the Gap: A Succinct Exploration of Research Gap Types. J. Adv. Parallel Comput. 2023;6:7–18. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8213522.
2. Cano-Vicent A., Tambuwala M.M., Hassan S.S., Barh D., Aljabali A.A., Birkett M., Arjunan A., Serrano-Aroca Á. Fused deposition modelling: Current status, methodology, applications and future prospects. Addit. Manuf. 2021;47:102378. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102378.
3. Roy R., Mukhopadhyay A. Tribological studies of 3D printed ABS and PLA plastic parts. Mater. Today Proc. 2020;41:856–862. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.235.
4. Prabhu R., Devaraju A. Recent review of tribology, rheology of biodegradable and FDM compatible polymers. Mater. Today Proc. 2020;39:781–788. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.509.
5. Srinivasan R., Babu B.S., Rani V.U., Suganthi M., Dheenasagar R. Comparision of tribological behaviour for parts fabricated through fused deposition modelling (FDM) process on abs and 20% carbon fibre PLA. Mater. Today Proc. 2020;27:1780–1786. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.689.
6. Equbal A., Sood A.K., Toppo V., Ohdar R.K., Mahapatra S.S. Prediction and analysis of sliding wear performance of fused deposition modelling-processed ABS plastic parts. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2010;224:1261–1271. doi: 10.1243/13506501JET835.
7. Keshavamurthy R., Tambrallimath V., Rajhi A.A., R. M S.A., Patil A.Y., Yunus Khan T.M., Makannavar R. Influence of solid lubricant addition on friction and wear response of 3D printed polymer composites. Polymers. 2021;13:2905. doi: 10.3390/polym13172905.
8. Raichur S., Ravishankar R., Kumar R.R. Tribological Studies of Nanoclay-Reinforced PLA Composites Developed by 3D Printing Technology. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. D. 2024;105:517–525. doi: 10.1007/s40033-023-00500-y.
9. Shlykov, S., Rogulin, R., & Kondrashev, S. (2022). Determination of the dynamic performance of natural viscoelastic composites with different proportions of reinforcing fibers. Curved and Layered Structures, 9(1), 116-123.
10. Mourya V., Bhore S.P., Wandale P.G. Multiobjective optimization of tribological characteristics of 3D printed texture surfaces for ABS and PLA Polymers. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2023;37:772–799. doi: 10.1177/08927057231185710.
11. Ol’Khovik E. Study of abrasive resistance of foundries models obtained with use of additive technology. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2017;87:092019. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/87/9/092019.
12. Neilsen LE. Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites. Vol. 1. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1974. ISBN: 0824761839.
13. Chartoff R., Weissman P., Sircar A. The application of dynamic mechanical methods to Tg determination in polymers: an overview. In: R. Seyler (ed.), Assignment of the Glass Transition. ASTM International; 1994:88–107.
14. Carey BJ., Patra PK., Ci L., et al. Observation of dynamic strain hardening in polymer nanocomposites. ACS Nano. 2011;5:2715–2722.
15. Agarwal A., Chipara AC., Shamoo Y., et al. Dynamic self-stiffening in liquid crystal elastomers. Nat Commun. 2013;4:16.
16. Abraham J., Vasu KS., Williams CD., et al. Tunable sieving of ions using graphene oxide membranes. Nat Nanotechnol. 2017;12:546–550.
17. Cao L., Wu H., Yang P., et al. Graphene oxide-based solid electrolytes with 3D prepercolating pathways for efficient proton transport. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1804944.
18. Compton OC., Cranford SW., Putz KW., et al. Tuning the mechanical properties of graphene oxide paper and its associated polymer nanocomposites by controlling cooperative intersheet hydrogen bonding. ACS Nano. 2012;6:2008–2019.
19. Poynting JH. The wave motion of a revolving shaft, and a suggestion as to the angular momentum in a beam of circularly polarised light. Proc R So A. 1909;82:560–567.
20. Dealy J. Rheometers for Molten Plastics. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1992.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Elena M. Duarte

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.