Data-Centric Asset Health Management across Automated Manufacturing Networks: A Pathway to Enhanced Output Efficiency

Authors

  • Ri Jong-Ho Pyongyang Academy of Scientific Research North Korea

Keywords:

Asset Health Management, Predictive Maintenance, Industrial Automation, Machine Learning

Abstract

Modern automated manufacturing networks are increasingly dependent on the operational reliability of distributed physical assets, ranging from industrial transformers and robotic subsystems to sensor-driven production modules. As manufacturing systems evolve toward fully digitalized and interconnected architectures, the need for data-centric asset health management (DCAHM) becomes critical for ensuring uninterrupted production efficiency, minimizing downtime, and optimizing lifecycle costs. This paper proposes a comprehensive analytical synthesis of data-driven prognostics and health management strategies adapted from power system reliability frameworks and extended into automated manufacturing environments.

The study integrates machine learning-based predictive maintenance approaches, statistical reliability modeling, and fuzzy logic-driven decision systems to establish a unified conceptual foundation for asset health evaluation. Techniques such as sequence learning-based health index prediction (Dong et al., 2021), modified Weibull reliability modeling (Dong & Nassif, 2018), and neural network-based diagnostic frameworks (Murad et al., 2023) are examined and contextualized within manufacturing networks. Additionally, fuzzy logic-based remnant life estimation models (Bakar & Abu-Siada, 2016) and multiparameter health assessment techniques (Mharakurwa & Goboza, 2019) are incorporated to address uncertainty in heterogeneous industrial environments.

The paper further explores how data-centric predictive architectures can be generalized beyond electrical asset management into broader manufacturing ecosystems characterized by distributed intelligence and real-time operational feedback loops. A comparative synthesis of existing methodologies highlights the transition from rule-based maintenance systems to adaptive, AI-driven prognostic frameworks. The findings emphasize that hybrid modeling approaches combining statistical reliability theory and machine learning significantly improve prediction accuracy and operational decision-making.

Finally, the study identifies key limitations, including data heterogeneity, scalability constraints, and interpretability challenges in deep learning models. The research concludes that integrating structured health indices with real-time data streams can substantially enhance output efficiency in automated manufacturing networks, while also supporting sustainable asset lifecycle management strategies.

References

1. Annas, M., et al., “Data-driven strategies for optimal performance and maintenance: Using machine learning for improved power transformer management,” Proc. ICPEE, 2023.

2. Balali, F., Seifoddini, H., and Nasiri, A., “Essentials to develop data-driven predictive models of prognostics and health management for distributed electrical systems,” Proc. PHM, 2019.

3. Bakar, N. A., “Power transformer asset management and remnant life,” 2018.

4. Bakar, N. A., and Abu-Siada, A., “Fuzzy logic approach for transformer remnant life prediction and asset management decision,” IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2163–2171, 2016.

5. Dong, Ming, Wenyuan Li, and Alexandre B. Nassif. “Long-term health index prediction for power asset classes based on sequence learning.” IEEE transactions on power delivery 37. 1 ( 2021 ): 197 - 207.

6. Dong, Ming, and Alexandre B. Nassif. “Combining modified Weibull distribution models for power system reliability forecast.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 34. 2 ( 2018 ): 1610 - 1619.

7. Mharakurwa, E. T., and Goboza, R., “Multiparameter-based fuzzy logic health index assessment for oil-immersed power transformers,” Adv. Fuzzy Syst., 2019.

8. Murad, A., et al., “Development of power transformer health index assessment using feedforward neural network,” J. Adv. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., 2023.

9. D. Pai, K. Pappu and Y. K. Gangaiah, "Audit-Ready Fraud Detection: Aligning Gradient Boosting and SHAP with GDPR and SOX Compliance," 2026 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Systems, and Emerging Technologies (ICAISET), Cairo, Egypt, 2026, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/ICAISET66439.2026.11541999

10. Pandey, C. P., Upadhyay, H., Kale, A., Joshi, P., & Sri, B. (2026). AI-driven fraud detection and risk forecasting framework for real-time financial transactions. Scientific Culture, 12(1 Part 1), 3425.

11. Wani, Shufali Ashraf, et al. “Advances in DGA based condition monitoring of transformers: A review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 149 ( 2021 ): 111347.

12. Wani, S. A., et al., “Advances in DGA based condition monitoring of transformers: A review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 149, 111347, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

Ri Jong-Ho. (2026). Data-Centric Asset Health Management across Automated Manufacturing Networks: A Pathway to Enhanced Output Efficiency. International Journal of Advance Scientific Research, 6(06), 74-83. https://sciencebring.com/index.php/ijasr/article/view/1245

Similar Articles

21-30 of 390

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.