SCIENCEBRING   /   HAMBURG, GERMANY
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research SCIENTIFIC IDEAS. INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES.
ISSN 2750-1396 12 issues per year · Monthly
Crossref DOI: 10.37547/ijasr

Search the Journal

Articles Published:

Radiographic Assessment of Cranial Pit Characteristics in the Dogra Community: A Population-Based Observational Investigation

Vol. 4 No. 06 (2024): Volume 04 Issue 06 Pages 195-205
RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Abstract

The Cranial base morphology, particularly pituitary fossa (sellar region) characteristics, plays a crucial role in craniofacial diagnostics, neuroendocrine assessment, and population-specific anatomical profiling. Variations in cranial pit dimensions are influenced by genetic, ethnic, and environmental factors, making population-based studies essential for establishing normative radiographic references. The present study investigates cranial pit characteristics in the Dogra community using a radiographic observational framework, with a focus on structural dimensions, morphological variability, and comparative anatomical interpretation.
Existing literature highlights that cranial base and sellar morphology vary significantly across populations and are strongly associated with broader craniofacial architecture (ARSHAD et al., 2023). Furthermore, advanced statistical modeling techniques and image-based analytical frameworks have been widely used to improve precision in radiographic interpretation (Donoho & Johnstone, 1994; Donoho & Johnstone, 1995). These approaches support the objective quantification of anatomical structures, reducing observer bias and improving reproducibility in cranial measurements.
This study integrates radiographic assessment principles with statistical interpretation models to evaluate cranial pit depth, width, and proportional indices in a representative Dogra population sample. Emphasis is placed on identifying morphological deviations and establishing baseline reference patterns. The findings are interpreted in relation to population-specific craniofacial characteristics reported in previous cephalometric studies (ARSHAD et al., 2023), highlighting potential anatomical continuity and variation within North Indian ethnic groups.
The results indicate measurable variability in cranial pit morphology, suggesting that ethnic-specific standards are essential for accurate radiological evaluation. Additionally, the study underscores the importance of integrating imaging perception theories and computational enhancement techniques in medical radiography (Krupinski, 2010; Pianykh et al., 2018). These contribute to improved diagnostic reliability in assessing subtle anatomical differences.
Overall, the research provides a structured radiographic baseline for cranial pit evaluation in the Dogra community and supports the need for population-specific anatomical databases. The findings have implications in neurosurgical planning, orthodontic diagnostics, and radiological anthropology. 

Keywords

SOURCES & CITATIONS

References

1. ARSHAD, F., GUPTA, A., LONE, P. A., & GUPTA, R. (2023). Sellar Metrics and Morphology in Ethnic Dogra Population of Jammu Region-A Cross-sectional Cephalometric Study. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, 17(5).
2. D. L. Donoho and I. M. Johnstone, “Ideal spatial adaptation via wavelet shrinkage,” Biometrika, vol. 81, pp. 425–455, 1994.
3. D. L. Donoho and I. M. Johnstone, “Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage,” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., vol. 90, pp. 1200–1224, Dec. 1995.
4. Y. Dodge, The Concise Encyclopedia of Statistics, New York : Springer, 2008.
5. E.A. Krupinski, “Current Perspectives in Medical Image Perception,” Attention, Perception Psychophysics, vol. 72, pp. 1205–1217, 2010.
6. P. Irrera, I. Bloch, M. Delplanque, “A flexible based approach for combined denoisisng and contrast enhancement of digital X-ray images,” Medical Image Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 28, pp. 33–45, 2016.
7. S. Lee, M. Lee, M. G. Kang, “Poisson–Gaussian Noise Analysis and Estimation for Low-Dose X-ray Images in the NSCT Domain,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1019, 2018.
8. O.S. Pianykh, K. Pospelova and N. H. Kamboj, “Modeling Human Perception of Image Quality,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 31, pp. 768–775, 2018.
9. V. Ostojiæ, Ð. Starèeviæ, and V. Petroviæ, “Recursive anisotropic diffusion denoising,” Electronics Letters, vol. 52, no. 17, pp. 1449–1451, 2016.
10. V. Ostojiæ, “Integrated multi-scale radiography image processing,” Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia, 2018.
11. B. Pejak, “Objective X-ray images quality assessment,” Graduate thesis, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia, 2017.
12. R. Schaetzing, “Agfa’s musica2 taking image processing to the next level,” AGFA Health Care, Tech. Rep., 2007.
13. S. L. Solomon, R. G. Jost, H. S. Glazer, S. S. Sagel, D. J. Anderson, and P. L. Molina, “Artifacts in computed radiography,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 181–185, 1991.
14. I. Daubechies, Ten Lectures on Wavelets (CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics), SIAM, 1992.
DISCOVER RELATED RESEARCH

Similar Articles

Continue exploring the collection ↗
1-10 of 393