In this article, the logical, systematic, logical-legal, comparative-legal methods of research are widely used. In particular, the formation of the doctrine of the crime compound and its stages of historical development are described in detail. Including, first of all, the most Continental (Romano-Germanic) and Anglo-Saxon (Common) from large law families the objective side of the crime structure in the doctrine of criminal law existing in the family of law and The concept of "actus reus" is scientific about them by the scholars of each family of law views, studies, similarities and differences between them described in detail. Also, the objective aspect of the crime and "actus reus" concept has been analyzed in comparative law and the problematic aspects in them are sequential described. In this article, the main focus is on the objective aspect of the composition of the crime advantages of signs and "actus reus-mens" in criminal law in the Anglo-Saxon legal family rea" on the "corpus delicti" (composition of the crime) consisting of a criminal act aspects related to the shortcomings of the theory are both theoretically and practically justified. At the same time, criminal law exists in the Anglo-Saxon (common) law family scientists in the doctrine J.Austin, M.Moore, D. Husak, J.Fletcher, H.Morris, M.Gore, A.Enker, W.Blackstone, G.Williams and Russian belonging to the continental (Romano-Germanic) family of law scientists A.N.Trainin, N.F.Kuznetsova, V.N. Kudryavtsev, D.M.Molchanov and others, as well as national scientists A.S.Yakubov, M.Kh.Rustamboev, S.S.Nayimov, M.Usmonaliev and Scientific works of P.Bakunovlar and others were used. At the same time, continental (Romano-Germanic) and Anglo-Saxon (common) law countries are crimes analyzed the criminal legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan in this regard specific proposals and recommendations for improvement have been developed.

Crime, objective side of crime, corpus delicti, actus reus, mens rea, social dangerous act

Jinoyat huquqi. (Umumiy qism) Darslik. Mas’ul muharrir: yu.f.f.d (PhD) X.Ochilov – T.: Adolat nashriyoti, 2020. – B.41. (Criminal law. (General part) Textbook. Responsible editor: yu.f.f.d (PhD) H. Ochilov - T.: Adolat publishing house, 2020. - P.41.)

John Austin, Lectures On Jurisprudence 523 (4th Ed. 1873)., Michael S. Moore, Act And Crime: The philosophy of action and its implications for criminal Law 18 (1993)., Douglas N. Husak, The Orthodox model of the criminal offense, 10 Crim. Just. Ethics 20, 21 (1991)., George Fletcher, On the moral irrelevance of bodily movements, 142 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1443 (1994)., Herbert Morris, Punishment for thoughts, guilt and innocence: Essays in legal philosophy and moral psychology 197 (1989), Michael Gorr, The Actus Reus requirement: A qualified defense, 10 Crim. Just. Ethics 11 (1991)., Arnold N. Enker, Impossibility in criminal attempts–legality and the legalprocess, 53 Minn. L. Rev. 665, 687 (1969)., Sir William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book IV, P. 21 (10th Ed. 1787)., Glanville Williams, Criminal Law: The General Part 22 (2d. Ed. 1961)., Glanville Williams, Criminal Law: The General Part 22 (2d. Ed. 1961).

Kuznesova N.F. Problemы kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. M., 2007. – S. 11., Traynin A. N. Obщee uchenie o sostave prestupleniya. M., 1957., Kuznesova N. F. Sostav prestupleniya: spornыe voprosы // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser.: Pravo. 1987. № 4., Kudryavsev V. N. Ob’ektivnaya storona prestupleniya. M., 1960. S. 46–47. (Kuznetsova N.F. Problems of qualification of crimes. M., 2007. - P. 11., Trainin A. N. The general doctrine of the composition of the crime. M., 1957., Kuznetsova N.F. Composition of the crime: controversial issues // Vestn. Moscow university Ser.: Right. 1987. No. 4., Kudryavtsev VN The objective side of the crime. M., 1960. P. 46–47.)

Molchanov D.M. Aktualnыe problemы ugolovnogo prava: Obщaya chast: uchebnoe posobie. – Moskva: Prospekt, 2016. – S. 16. (Molchanov D. M. Actual problems of criminal law: General part: textbook. - Moscow: Prospekt, 2016. - P. 16.)

Usmonaliev M., Bakunov P. Jinoyat huquqi. Umumiy qism: Darslik. – Toshkent: Nasaf, 2010. – B. 128. (Usmonaliev M., Bakunov P. Criminal law. General part: Textbook. - Tashkent: Nasaf, 2010. - P. 128.)

Yakubov A.S. Teoriticheskie problemы formirovaniya pravovoy osnovы ucheniya o prestupleniy: predposilki, realnost, perspektivi. - T., 1996, – S. 95., Rustambayev M.X. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi jinoyat huquqi kursi. Tom 1. Jinoyat haqida ta’limot. Darslik. 2-nashr, to‘ldirilgan va qayta ishlangan – T.: O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Milliy gvardiyasi Harbiy-texnik instituti, 2018. – Б.137., Nayimov.S.S. Qilmishni jinoiy huquqiy normalar raqobatida kvalifikatsiya qilishning nazariy va amaliy masalalari. Diss...Yurid.fan.nom. – Toshkent, 2003. – B.61., Jinoyat huquqi. (Umumiy qism) Darslik. Mas’ul muharrir: yu.f.f.d (PhD) X.Ochilov – T.: Adolat nashriyoti, 2020. – B.41. (Yakubov A.S. Theoretical problems of formation of the legal basis of the doctrine of crimes: background, reality, prospects. - T., 1996, - P. 95., Rustambayev M.Kh. Course of criminal law of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Volume 1. Doctrine of crime. Textbook. 2nd edition, supplemented and revised - T.: Military-technical institute of the National Guard of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2018. - P. 137., Nayimov.S.S. Theoretical and practical issues of qualification of the crime in competition of criminal legal norms. Diss...Jurid.science.nom. - Tashkent, 2003. - P. 61., Criminal law. (General part) Textbook. Responsible editor: yu.f.f.d (PhD) H. Ochilov - T.: Adolat publishing house, 2020. - P.41.)

Paul H. Robinson, Should the Criminal Law abandon the Actus Reus – Mens Rea distinction? Criminal Law: Action, Value And Structure 187, 209 (S. Shute, J. Gardner & J. Horder, Eds. 1993. Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012)., John Austin, Lectures on Jurisprudence 523 (4th Ed. Publisher: London, J. Murray. 1873, [S.l.]: Book on demand LTD, 2022)., A.C.E. Lynch, The Mental element in The Actus Reus, 98 L. Q. Rev. 116, 128 (1982).

Glanville Williams, Criminal Law: The General Part 22 (2d. Ed. 1961, Holmes Beach Florida: Gaunt Reprint, 1998) 644.

James Mangiafico, The Independence Of Actus reus 11 (2011) (Mangiafico, James, The Independence of the Actus Reus (February 17, 2011). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1763352 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1763352).

George P. Fletcher, Rethinking Criminal Law 166 (Originally published: Boston : Little, Brown, c1978. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.).

Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Common Law 54 (1881 Publisher: London: Routledge, 2020.)

J.W.Cicil Turner, Kenny’s outlines of Criminal Law. 18, P. 30 (19th Ed. Publisher: Cambridge University Press, 1966. Cambridge University Press; 18th edition (September 19, 2013)).

Oliver Wendell Holmes, There, – P. 54.

Glanville Williams, Criminal Law: The General Part 22 (2d. Ed. 1961, Holmes Beach Florida: Gaunt Reprint, 1998) 12.

James Mangiafico. There. – P.15

J.W. Cicil Turner. There. – P. 53.

James Mangiafico. There. – P. 29.

Ochilov X.R., Xaydarov Sh.D., Shamsidinov Z.Z. “Jinoyat huquqi” (Umumiy qism). O‘quv qo‘llanma – T.: TDYU nashriyoti, 2021. – B.34. (Ochilov H.R., Khaidarov Sh.D., Shamsidinov Z.Z. "Criminal law" (General part). Study guide - T.: TSUL publishing house, 2021. - P.34.)

La Fave W.R., Scott, Jr., A. W. Op. Cit. P. 202.

H.L.A. Hart. Acts of will and responsibility in punishment and responsibility 100 (1968 Publisher: Cary: Oxford Scholarship Online, 2014.)

Michael Corrado. Is there an act requirement in the Criminal Law?, 142 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1529, 1538-44(1994), Corrado, Michael. “Is There an Act Requirement in the Criminal Law?” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 142, no. 5, 1994, pp. 1529–61. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3312462. Accessed 23 Jul. 2022.

James Mangiafico. There. – P.30.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theft

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1

Criminal Code of Canada (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46) // Act current to 2022-06-20 and last amended on 2022-06-20. Previous Versions // https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/page-46.html#h-121703

http://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=30394923#pos=808;-50

Алланова А. А. Хорижий давлатлар жиноят қонунчилигида жазони енгиллаштирувчи ва оғирлаштирувчи ҳолатлар //ЖУРНАЛ ПРАВОВЫХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ. – 2022. – №. SI-2.

Алланова А. А. Жиноий равишда ҳомила туширганлик (аборт) учун жавобгарлик: қиёсий-ҳуқуқий таҳлил //журнал правовых исследований. – 2022. – Т. 7. – №. 1.

Алланова А. А. Европа давлатлари ва Америка Қўшма Штатларида қонунга хилоф равишда давлат чегарасидан ўтиш билан боғлиқ жиноятлар учун жавобгарлик масалалари //журнал правовых исследований. – 2020. – Т. 5. – №. 8.