CONCEPTS OF CAUSATION IN CRIMINAL LAW: PROBLEMS, ANALYSIS AND SOLUTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijasr-03-06-48Keywords:
Crime,, corpus delicti, objective side of a crimeAbstract
The article widely uses logical, inductive, deductive, systematic, logical-legal, comparative-legal research methods. In particular, it was noted that the issue of causation in the institutions of general and special parts of criminal law is very complicated and there are many problems with it. In the theory of criminal law, scientists put forward eleven theories of causation in their scientific works, and the content of the most important of them is analyzed in this article, as well as specific shortcomings of theories of causation are recognized. The scientific views and researches of scientists regarding the theories of causation in criminal law, the similarities and differences between them are described in detail. At the same time, two of the theories of causation in foreign criminal law are widely used: the theory of equivalence and adequacy, and among them: the first contains the necessary conditions ("conditio sine qua non" - "there is no condition without a necessary condition..."), and the second is adequate( exactly the same, equal, suitable) are stated to represent conditions. Also, the legal nature of eleven theories of causation in the theory of criminal law, their specific rules are comparatively analyzed, their problematic aspects are identified and sequentially described. This article focuses on eleven theories of causation in criminal law theory and provides an instrumental and comparative analysis of their intertwined provisions. Also, out of the eleven theories of causation, the theory of direct causation was found to be the most widely used. At the same time, the doctrine of criminal law and existing scientific research were analyzed, and reasonable theoretical recommendations were developed in this regard.
Downloads
References
И.Я.Козаченко, В.Н.Курченко, Я.М.Злоченко «Проблемы причинной связи в институтах Общей и Особенной частей отечественного уголовного права». СПб., 2003. – С. 26., 44., Хайдаров Ш.Д. Касб юзасидан ўз вазифаларини лозим даражада бажармаслик: жиноят-ҳуқуқий ва криминологик жиҳатлари. Монография. Масъул маҳарир: ю.ф.д., профессор Ж.А.Неъматов - Тошкент давлат юридик университети, 2021. – Б. 50. (I.Ya.Kozachenko, V.N.Kurchenko, Ya.M.Zlochenko "Problems of causality in the institutions of the General and Special parts of domestic criminal law." SPb., 2003. - P. 26., 44., Khaidarov Sh.D. Inadequate performance of one's duties related to the profession: criminal-legal and criminological aspects. Monograph. Responsible teacher: PhD, professor J.A. Nematov - Tashkent State Law University, 2021. - P. 50.)
Джекебаев У.С. Основные принципы уголовного права Республики Казахстан (сравнительный комментарий к книге Дж.Флетчера и А.В.Наумова «Основные концепции современного уголовного права»). – Алматы: Жетi жарғы, 2001, – С. 108. (Dzhekebaev U.S. Basic principles of criminal law of the Republic of Kazakhstan (comparative commentary on the book by J. Fletcher and A.V. Naumov "Basic concepts of modern criminal law"). - Almaty: Zheti zhargy, 2001, - P. 108.)
Kries J. Uber den Begriff der objectiven Moglichkeit und einige Anvendungen dessel ben. Leipzig, 1888. – S. 228. (Kries J. On the concept of objective possibility and some applications of it. Leipzig, 1888. – P. 228.)
Тарарухин С.А. Квалификация преступлений в следственной и судебной практике. Монография Киев: «Юринком», 1995.. – С. 100., Клепицкий И. А. Причинная связь в уголовном праве Англии //Вестник Университета имени ОЕ Кутафина. – 2022. – №. 10 (98). – С. 96-109. (Tararukhin S.A. Qualification of crimes in investigative and judicial practice. Monograph Kyiv: "Yurinkom", 1995 .. - P. 100., Klepitsky I. A. Causal connection in the criminal law of England // Bulletin of the University named after OE Kutafin. – 2022. – no. 10(98). - P. 96-109.)
Stubel. Uberden Tatherstand der Verbrechen, Leipzig, 1805. – S. 56. (Stubel. About the facts of the crimes, Leipzig, 1805. – P. 56.)
Антимонов Б.С. Значение вины потерпевшего при гражданском правонарушении. - М.: Госюриздат, 1950. – С. 184. (Antimonov B.S. The value of the guilt of the victim in a civil offense. - M.: Gosjurizdat, 1950. - P. 184.)
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Олий Судининг Пленумининг “Баданга қасддан шикаст етказишга оид ишлар бўйича суд амалиёти тўғрисида”ги қарори. https://lex.uz/docs/1592419 // Қонун ҳужжатлари маълумотлари миллий базаси. 2007 йил 27 июнь, 6-сон. (Decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On judicial practice in cases related to intentional bodily injury". https://lex.uz/docs/1592419 // National database of legal documents. June 27, 2007, No. 6.)
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Олий Судининг Пленумининг “Ҳарбий хизматни ўташ тартибига қарши жиноятларга оид ишларни кўриш бўйича суд амалиёти тўғрисида”ги қарори. https://lex.uz/docs/1449962 // Қонун ҳужжатлари маълумотлари миллий базаси. 2000 йил 15 сентябрь, 23-сон. (The decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On the judicial practice of considering cases related to crimes against the order of military service". https://lex.uz/docs/1449962 // National database of legal documents. September 15, 2000, No. 23.)
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Олий Судининг Пленумининг “Транспорт ҳаракати ва ундан фойдаланиш хавфсизлигига қарши жиноятлар билан боғлиқ ишлар юзасидан суд амалиётининг айрим масалалари тўғрисида”ги қарори https://lex.uz/docs/2710284 // Қонун ҳужжатлари маълумотлари миллий базаси. 2015 йил 26 июнь, 10-сон. (Decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On some issues of judicial practice in cases related to crimes against the safety of transport and its use" https://lex.uz/docs/2710284 // National database of legal documents. June 26, 2015, No. 10.)
Жиноят ишлари бўйича Шайхантохур туман суд архиви материалларидан. 2023. 1-1003-2301/334 рақамли иш. (From the materials of Shaikhantokhur district court archive on criminal cases. 2023. Case number 1-1003-2301/334.)
Уголовное право. Общая часть / Под ред. А. А.Пионтковского. - М.: Юрид. изд-во МЮ, 1948. – С. 303., Решетникова С.Б. Доктрины причинной связи в уголовном праве: проблемы практического применения //Отечественная юриспруденция. – 2016. – №. 8 (10). – С. 42-46. (Criminal law. General part / Ed. A. A. Piontkovsky. - M.: Yurid. MJ publishing house, 1948. - P. 303., Reshetnikova S.B. Doctrines of causality in criminal law: problems of practical application // Domestic jurisprudence. – 2016. – no. 8 (10). - P. 42-46.)
Гаухман Л.Д. Квалификация преступлений закон, теория, практика. - М.: ЮрИнфоР, 2001. – С. 116. (Gaukhman L.D. Qualification of crimes law, theory, practice. - M.: YurInfoR, 2001. - P. 116.)
Малинин В.Б., Парфенов А.Ф. М 19 Объективная сторона преступления. – СПб.:Издательство Юридического института (Санкт-Петербург), 2004. – С. 108. (Malinin V.B., Parfenov A.F. M 19 The objective side of the crime. - St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Law Institute (St. Petersburg), 2004. - P. 108.)
Князев Н.А. Причинность: новое видение классической проблемы. – С. 77-78. (Knyazev N.A. Causality: a new vision of a classical problem. - P. 77-78.)
Усмоналиев М., Бакунов П. Жиноят ҳуқуқи. Умумий қисм: Дарслик. – Тошкент: Насаф, 2010. – Б. 189. (Usmonaliev M., Bakunov P. Criminal law. General part: Textbook. - Tashkent: Nasaf, 2010. - P. 189.)
Rustambayev M.X.O‘zbekiston Respublikasi jinoyat huquqi kursi.Tom 1.Jinoyat haqida ta’limot.Darslik. 2-nashr, to‘ldirilgan va qayta ishlangan - T.:O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Milliy gvardiyasi Harbiy-texnik instituti, 2018. – B. 168. (Rustambayev M.K. Course of criminal law of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Volume 1. Doctrine of crime. Textbook. 2nd edition, supplemented and revised - T.: Military-technical institute of the National Guard of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2018. - P. 168.)
Прохоров B.C. Объективная сторона преступления // Курс советского уголовного права/ Под ред. Н.А.Беляева, М.Д.Шаргородского. Т. 1. Общая часть. – С. 352. (Prokhorov B.C. The objective side of the crime // Course of Soviet criminal law / Ed. N.A. Belyaev, M.D. Shargorodsky. T. 1. General part. - P. 352.)
Семенов П.Г. Проблемы причинной связи в советском праве // Учен. зап. ВИЮН. М., 1958. Вып. 8. – С. 280. (Semenov P.G. Problems of causality in Soviet law // Uchen. app. VIYUN. M., 1958. Issue. 8. - P. 280.)
Сергеева Т.Л. Вопросы виновности и вины в практике Верховного Суда по уголовным делам. М., 1950. – C.85. (Sergeeva T.L. Issues of guilt and guilt in the practice of the Supreme Court in criminal cases. M., 1950. - P.85.)
Ярмыш Н.Н. Теоретические проблемы причинно-следственной связи в уголовном праве (философскоправовой аспект). Харьков, 2003. – С. 444. (Yarmysh N.N. Theoretical problems of causality in criminal law (philosophical and legal aspect). Kharkov, 2003. - P. 444.)
Хайдаров Ш.Дж. Касб юзасидан ўз вазифаларини лозим даражада бажармаслик: жиноят-ҳуқуқий ва криминологик жиҳатлари. Юридик фанлар бўйича фалсафа доктори (PhD)...дисс. –Тошкент: 2019. – Б. 68-69. (Haydarov Sh.Dj. Inadequate performance of one's duties related to the profession: criminal-legal and criminological aspects. Doctor of Philosophy in Legal Sciences (PhD)...diss. - Tashkent: 2019. - P. 68-69.)
Сурхондарё вилояти суд архиви материалларидан.. 2022. 1-1607-2202/105 рақамли иш. (From the materials of the court archive of Surkhandarya region.. 2022. Case number 1-1607-2202/105.)
Уголовное право России. Часть Общая / Под ред. Л.Л.Кругликова. М., 1999. – С. 164. (Criminal law of Russia. Part General / Ed. L.L. Kruglikova. M., 1999. - P. 164.)
Сергеевский Н.Д. О значении причинной связи в уголовном праве. - Ярославль: Типо-лит. Г. Фальк, 1880. – С. 46., Михайленко П.П. Уголовное право Украины. Общая часть. Киев, 1995. – С. 73-74. (Sergeevsky N.D. On the meaning of causality in criminal law. - Yaroslavl: Tipo-lit. G. Falk, 1880. - S. 46., Mikhailenko P.P. Criminal law of Ukraine. A common part. Kyiv, 1995. - P. 73-74.)
Сергеевский Н.Д.О значении причинной связи в уголовном праве.-Ярославль:Типо-лит.Г.Фальк,1880.-С.47. (Sergeevsky N.D. On the meaning of causation in criminal law.-Yaroslavl: Tipo-lit. G. Falk, 1880.-P.47.)
Клепицкий И.А. Причинная связь в уголовном праве Франции //Актуальные проблемы российского права. – 2023. – Т. 18. – №. 3 (148). – С. 174-185. (Klepitsky I.A. Causality in the criminal law of France // Actual problems of Russian law. - 2023. - T. 18. - No. 3 (148). - P. 174-185.)
Ҳакимов К.Б. Аффект ҳолатида содир этиладиган жиноятлар (жиноят-ҳуқуқий ва криминологик жиҳатлари). Монография. Масъул муҳаррир ю.ф.д. доцент. М.Ўразалиев. – Тошкент: ТДЮУ, 2019. – Б. 48. (Hakimov K.B. Crimes committed in a state of affect (criminal-legal and criminological aspects). Monograph. Responsible editor Yu.F.D. associate professor M. Orazaliev. - Tashkent: TDUU, 2019. - P. 48.)
Флетчер Дж., Наумов А.В. Основные концепции современного уголовного права. – М.: Юристъ, 1998. – С. 178., Джекебаев У.С. Основные принципы уголовного права Республики Казахстан (сравнительный комментарий к книге Дж.Флетчера и А.В.Наумова «Основные концепции современного уголовного права»). – Алматы: Жетi жарғы, 2001, – С. 109. (Fletcher J., Naumov A.V. Basic concepts of modern criminal law. - M.: Jurist, 1998. - P. 178., Dzhekebaev U.S. Basic principles of criminal law of the Republic of Kazakhstan (comparative commentary on the book by J. Fletcher and A.V. Naumov "Basic concepts of modern criminal law"). - Almaty: Zheti zhargy, 2001, - P. 109.)
Кушбаков Д.М. Жиноят субъектининг жиноят-ҳуқуқий тавсифи ва унинг хусусиятлари. Юридик фанлар бўйича фалсафа доктори (PhD)...дисс. –Тошкент: 2021. – Б. 107-108., Гребеньков А.А. Уголовная ответственность лиц, совершивших преступление в состоянии опьянения. Автореф. дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. – Краснодар, 2009. – 52 с. (Kushbakov D.M. Criminal-legal description of the subject of crime and its characteristics. Doctor of Philosophy in Legal Sciences (PhD)...diss. - Tashkent: 2021. - P. 107-108., Grebenkov A.A. Criminal liability of persons who committed a crime in a state of intoxication. Abstract dis. ... cand. legal Sciences. - Krasnodar, 2009. - 52 p.)
Успенский А В. Проблемы обоснования причинной связи при соучастии в преступлении // Вестник МГУ. Сер. 11. Право. 1995. № 5. – С. 103-107. (Uspensky A. V. Problems of substantiation of causality in case of complicity in a crime // Bulletin of Moscow State University. Ser. 11. Right. 1995. No. 5. - P. 103-107.)
Российское уголовное право. Общая часть / Под ред. В.Н.Кудрявцева, А.В.Наумова. М., 2001. – С. 111. (Russian criminal law. General part / Ed. V.N. Kudryavtseva, A.V. Naumova. M., 2001. - P. 111.)
Сурхондарё вилояти суд архиви материалларидан.. 2022. 1-1515-2202/101 рақамли иш. (From the materials of the court archive of Surkhandarya region.. 2022. Case number 1-1515-2202/101.)
Allanova A. THE CONCEPT OF THE CRIMINAL AND HIS CRIME RATIO TO THE SUBJECT //International Journal of Advance Scientific Research. – 2023. – Т. 3. – №. 02. – С. 18-23.
Allanova A. GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR RELEASE FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE FACT THAT THE GUILTY PERSON HAS ACTUALLY REPENTED OF HIS ACT //International Journal of Advance Scientific Research. – 2022. – Т. 2. – №. 12. – С. 94-99.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Feruzbek Khurramovich Khudaykulov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
