RESEARCH OVERVIEW
Abstract
The article provides a comparative analysis of the metaphors of the Uzbek and Russian languages, identifies their cognitive and pragmatic features, describes specific aspects, and develops the necessary conclusions and recommendations.
SOURCES & CITATIONS
References
Khojamkulov A. On the classification of metaphor in the Uzbek language. 20 of the independence of the Republic of Uzbekistan ¬a collection of scientific articles dedicated to the year. Linguist. 2 books. ‒ T.: Akademnashr, 2011. ‒ P. 85‒88.
Aleksandrov.M., Korjunov.V. // Journal of the Bashkir University. 2016. vol. 21. No. 3. - p. 698-705.
Beloshapkova, V.A. Sovremennyy russkii yazyk [Text] / V.A. Beloshapkova. — 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. — M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1989. — 800 p.
Nasrullaeva G. Sociopragmatic characteristics and lexicographic study of anthropomorphic metaphors: filol.fan.d-ri diss. -Fergana, 2021. -p. 37.
Arutyunova ND Metaphor i discourse. Moscow, 1990. -S. 45.
Telia VN Metaphorization i yeah role and composition summer y kovoy kartin y mira Role human factor v yaz y ke : Yaz y k i the picture mira Moscow, 1988. -S. 56.